The importance of using correct grammar

One of my readers recently sent me a link to a report undertaken by Website Planet, which highlights the importance of using correct grammar when writing and also checking for typos before publishing. 

The research found that grammatical errors and typos cost money to businesses and individual bloggers relying on income from online advertising.  Visitors arriving on your web pages are more likely to bounce out due to bad spelling and grammar, which means your ad quality score is affected and Google lowers your organic page ranking.  Anything which adversely affects the number of visitors to your site and the impression they have of your product has to be worth consideration.

Children don‘t always realise why we are teaching them to write correctly and check their work for mistakes, so any real-life reason might help. I’m posting the link to the report here for those of you who are interested. https://www.websiteplanet.com/blog/grammar-report/

Thank you Virginia!

Finite and non-finite clauses

For a sentence to be complete in English, it requires a finite verb.  A finite verb shows tense and can also show number and person when using the present tense (e.g. ‘sings’ denotes present tense, third person singular). A finite clause or sentence can stand on its own and make sense, e.g.

She is staring into space. (present progressive/continuous)

He was frightened by the traffic. (simple past - passive voice)

She frightened the cat. (simple past)

In the above examples, as in usual sentences, the subject is included.  When present or past participles are used as a non-finite verb, the subject is rarely included and the participle appears on its own.  E.g.

Staring into space – present participle ‘staring’

Frightened by the noise – regular past participle

Lit by a candle - irregular past participle

Past participles often look like the simple past tense with regular verbs having the same –ed suffix. However for irregular verbs (often the verbs coming from Old English), the form is different.  (For more on past participles, click on the past participle label on the right-hand side of my blog.)

Clauses containing non-finite verbs are called non-finite clauses.  Because they don’t contain a finite verb, they can’t be the main clause in a sentence as they would not make sense standing alone as a simple sentence. Therefore, they must stand as a subordinate clause and require a finite clause to complete the sentence.  In this way, complex sentences are formed.  

Staring into space, he heard nothing around him.

Frightened by the noise, the horse reared up.

Lit by a candle, the room looked romantic.

Using participles in non-finite clauses to create complex sentences adds variety to children’s writing. They can also experiment with swapping the clauses around for effect (and investigating the correct punctuation to use).  What is more effective?

Frightened by the noise, the horse reared up.

The horse reared up, frightened by the noise.

We can also add ‘to’ to the base form of the verb to create another non-finite form: the infinitive, e.g. to light, to drive.

To light a candle, you will need a match.

Non-finite clauses encourage children to vary their sentence structure.  In effect, the non-finite construction is filling the same function as a conjunction, by joining two clauses together within a sentence.

Using a past participle to start a relative clause

I have recently received a comment asking about the structure 'The significant percentage of work accomplished on the computer.'  

This is not a sentence as it does not contain a finite verb, but only the past participle ‘accomplished’. The actual structure is a noun phrase containing a relative clause.  However, the relative clause is not fronted by a relative pronoun, but by the past participle verb 'accomplished'.

The = determiner

(significant) percentage of = phrasal quantifier pre-modifying the main noun

work = main noun

accomplished on the computer = relative clause fronted by a non-finite past participle

The subordinate structure ‘accomplished on the computer’ could have been written ‘which was accomplished’.  Often in English we elide the relative pronoun and auxiliary verb to use the non-finite past participle in relative clause position.

So the whole structure is a noun phrase: the main noun work is pre-modified and also post-modified, but cannot stand on its own as a sentence.  You can test this by inserting it into the noun phrase position of sentences.  For example,

The significant percentage of work accomplished on the computer disproved the theory. (SVO structure with phrase in subject position)

The board approved the significant percentage of work accomplished on the computer. (SVO structure with phrase in object position)

If you wanted the original structure to act as a complete sentence, you would need to amend it so that ‘accomplished’ no longer appears as a non-finite verb:

The significant percentage of work was accomplished.  

(SV- the auxiliary verb ‘was’ + past participle ‘accomplished’ forms a passive verb.)

The significant percentage of work was accomplished.  

(SVC with ‘accomplished acting as an adjective in the complement position)